1887
Volume 5 Number 3
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604

Abstract

We apply seismic traveltime tomography in an investigation of the subsurface of a geoarchaeological site at Chatby cemeteries (Alexandria, Egypt). We are interested in obtaining information about the geological structure and the remains of man‐made structures. Energy sources are placed at the surface and recorders are distributed vertically in an underground location. Traveltime data are inverted with a three‐dimensional tomographic algorithm. Inversion results are evaluated and interpreted with the aid of independent geophysical and archaeological information, and various tests are carried out with different initial velocity models and synthetic traveltimes.

The inversion results show good correlation with the estimated geological structure, in particular at deeper levels, as suggested by independent geophysical and archaeological information and later confirmed by excavation. The depth and variations of the bedrock surface are satisfactorily imaged. Indications of possible man‐made structures are presented and discussed. Shallow velocity features are evaluated and interpreted using tests with synthetic traveltimes. The main goal of imaging the deeper structure was successful.

As inversion tests with different initial velocity models indicate, the subsurface structure and the complexity of data information in this particular case are better handled when using a single‐layer model than when using an average two‐layer model. The single‐layer model allows for a more versatile velocity variation and raypath distribution, while the two‐layer model leads to an inversion result that is considerably influenced by the initial velocity distribution. Enhancement of particular aspects of the single‐layer inversion result can be derived with the use of an initial velocity model, that permits a gradual increase of velocity with depth. The gradient model improves the raypath distribution and limits velocity artefacts.

The resulting images can assist in the assessment of the archaeological potential of a site, particularly in excavation design, in a non‐destructive manner. They can be also of great value in other applications, for example in engineering works, when detailed information on the subsurface is sought in areas of restricted access.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2006033
2018-12-18
2024-04-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AdrianiA.1963. Repertorio D’Arte dell’Egitto Greco‐Romano , ser. C. Vol. I–II, tav.1–113, num. 1–146 (in Italian).
    [Google Scholar]
  2. ClarkA.1996. Seeing Beneath the Soil . Routledge, UK.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Fakharani, El Fawzi1964. An investigation into the views concerning the location of the tomb of Alexander the Great. University of Alexandria Internal Publication, Vol. XVIII, 169–199.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. GaberS., El‐FikyA.A., Shagar AbouS. and MohamadenM.1999. Electrical resistivity exploration of the Royal Ptolemaic Necropolis in the royal quarter of ancient Alexandria, Egypt. Archaeological Prospection6, 1–10.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. JacksonM.J. and TweetonD.R.1997. 3DTOM: Three‐dimensional geophysical tomography . U.S. Bureau of Mines report, RI‐9617.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. LytleR.J., DinesK.A., LaineE.F. and LagerP.L.1978. Electromagnetic cross‐borehole survey of a site proposed for an urban transit station . Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, University of California, report UCLR‐52484.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. McMechanG.A.1983. Seismic tomography in boreholes. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society74, 601–612.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. PapamarinopoulosS.P., LiosisA., PolymenakosL., StephanopoulosP and K.Limnaeou‐Papakosta2003. In search of the Royal Ptolemaic Cemetery in Central Alexandria, Egypt – The first contact. Archaeological Prospection10, 193–211.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. PolymenakosL. and PapamarinopoulosS.2005. Exploring a prehistoric site for human structures by three dimensional seismic tomography. Archaeological Prospection12, 221–233.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. PolymenakosL., PapamarinopoulosS., LiossisA. and Koukouli‐FournarakiCh.2004. Investigation of a monumental Macedonian tumulus by three‐dimensional seismic tomography. Archaeological Prospection11, 145–158.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. PolymenakosL., PapamarinopoulosS., MiltiadouA. and CharkiolakisN.2005. Investigation of a Byzantine church by three‐dimensional seismic tomography. Applied Geophysics57, 81–93.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. PolymenakosL., TweetonD. and PapamarinopoulosS.2006. Velocity anisotropy in seismic traveltime tomography: a case study from the investigation of the foundation of a Byzantine monumental building. Geophysical Prospecting54, 1–14.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. PetersonJ.E., PaulsonB.N.P. and McEvillyT.V.1985. Applications of algebraic reconstruction techniques to crosshole seismic data. Geophysics50, 1566–1580.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. SchusterG.T.1996. Resolution limits for crosswell migration and travel‐time tomography. Geophysical Journal International127, 427–440.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. TweetonD.R.1999. Geotomcg, Three‐dimensional geophysical tomography. Geotom LLC, USA.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. UmJ. and ThurberC.1987. A fast algorithm for two‐point ray tracing. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America77, 972–986.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. ValleS., ZanziL. and RoccaF.1999. Radar tomography for NDT: comparison of techniques. Journal of Applied Geophysics41, 259–269.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2006033
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2006033
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error