1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Near Surface Geophysics
  4. Volume 8, Issue 4
  5. Article
Volume 8, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604

Abstract

ABSTRACT

We collected P‐wave seismic reflection data to image suspected breaches in the confining unit (aquitard) above the Memphis aquifer in Memphis, Tennessee, USA, where previous studies of water quality have suggested potential contamination. A 1‐km‐long reflection line was acquired across depressions of the water table that have been interpreted to reflect a breach in the aquitard. Although raw data are dominated by surface waves, after frequency filtering, shot static correction and filtering, consistent reflections can be observed. Integration of constant velocity analysis (CVS) and super gather semblance analysis was used to determine the RMS velocity field. The stack section shows a set of shallow reflectors interpreted to correspond to the top and bottom of the confining unit. The aquitard thins by about half from the north end to the south end along the reflection line. The continuity of the top and bottom of the aquitard was disrupted by a few faults interpreted along the line. None of these faults juxtapose the surficial aquifer against the Memphis aquifer but it is possible that the faults themselves may act as a hydraulic connection between the surficial aquifer and the Memphis aquifer and thus serve as pathways for a potential leakage. The refraction tomography technique was applied to the first arrival data and it revealed three depressions that are interpreted as paleochannels on the upper part of the confining unit, which is consistent with the background geology of the area. These inferred paleochannels may suggest that ancient river channel erosion may contribute to the process responsible for the formation of aquitard breaches in this area.

© European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers © 2010 European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2010025
2010-06-01
2024-04-26

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2010025
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BellE.A. and NymanD.J.1968. Flow pattern and related chemical quality of ground water in the ‘500‐foot’ sand in the Memphis area, Tennessee. US Geological Survey Water‐Supply Paper 1853.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. BrahanaJ.V., ParksS.W. and GaydosW.M.1987. Quality of water from freshwater aquifers and principal well fields in the Memphis area, Tennessee. USGS Water Resources Investigations Report 87‐4052.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. BroughtonA.T., Van ArsdaleR.B. and BroughtonJ.H.2001. Liquefaction susceptibility mapping in the city of Memphis and Shelby County, Tennessee. Engineering Geology62, 201–222.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. CardimonaJ.S., WilliamP.ClementP.W. and KadinskyC.K.1998. Seismic reflection and ground‐penetrating radar imaging of a shallow aquifer. Geophysics63, 1310–1317.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. CoxT.R., HillA.A., LarsenD., HolzerT., FormanL.S., NoceT., GardnerC. and MoratJ.2007. Seismotectonic implications of sand blows in the southern Mississippi Embayment. Engineering Geology89, 278–299.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. DobrinM.B. and SavitC.H.1988. Introduction to Geophysical Prospecting.McGraw‐Hill.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. FradelizioG.L., ZeltA.C. and LevanderA.2006. Using elastic wave seismic data to image an ultra‐shallow buried paleo‐channel. 76th SEG meeting, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, Expanded Abstracts, 1416.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. GrahamD.D. and ParksS.W.1986. Potential for leakage among principal aquifers in the Memphis area, Tennessee. USGS Water Resources Investigations Report 85‐4295.
  9. HaeniP.1986. Application of seismic refraction methods in groundwater modeling studies in New England. Geophysics51, 236–249.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. HenleyC.D., BirchR.A. and StewartR.R.2002. Near‐surface seismic imaging: refraction tomography and reflection imaging. CREWES Research Report, University of Calgary, 14, 1–15.
  11. JohnstonA.C. and SchweigS.E.1996. The enigma of the NEW Madrid earthquakes of 1881–1882. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences24, 339–384.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. KingsburyA.J. and ParksW.S.1993. Hydrogeology of the principal aquifers and relation of faults to interaquifer leakage in the Memphis Area, TN. USGS Water Resources Investigations Report 93‐4075.
  13. LanzE., MaurerH. and GreenA.G.1998. Refraction tomography over a buried waste disposal site. Geophysics63, 1441–1433.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. LiuH.‐P., HuY., DormanJ., ChangT. and ChiuJ.‐M.1997. Upper Mississippi embayment shallow seismic velocities measured in situ. Engineering Geology46, 313–330.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. MillerC.K., HarderS.H., AdamsD.C. and O’DonnellT.1998. Integrating high‐resolution refraction data into near‐surface seismic reflection data processing and interpretation. Geophysics63, 1339–1347.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. NuttliO.1973. The Mississippi Valley earthquakes of 1811 and 1812; intensities, ground motion, and magnitudes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America63, 227–248.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. OdumK.J., WilliamJ.S., RobertA.W., DavidM.W., MargaretJ.G. and Van ArsdaleR.B.2001. High resolution seismic reflection imaging of shallow deformation beneath the Northeast margin of Manila high at Big Lake. Engineering Geology62, 91–103.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. PalmerD.1980. The Generalized Reciprocal Method of Seismic Refraction Interpretation.SEG.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. ParksS.W.1990. Hydrogeology and preliminary assessment of the potential for contamination of the Memphis aquifer in the Memphis area, Tennessee. USGS Water Resources Investigations Report 90‐4092.
  20. ParksS.W. and CarmichaelK.J.1990. Geology and ground‐water resources of the Memphis Sand in western TN. USGS Water Resource Investigation Report 88‐4182.
  21. ParksS.W. and MireckiE.J.1992. Hydrogeology, ground‐water quality, and potential for water‐supply contamination near the Selby County Landfill in Memphis, Tennessee. USGS Water Resources Investigations Report 91‐4173.
  22. SchweigE.S., ShenF., KanterR.L., LuziettiE.A., Van Arsdal, R.B., ShedlockM.K. and KennethW.K.1992. Shallow seismic reflection survey of the Bootheel lineament area, southeastern MS. Seismological Research Letters63, 285–295.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. SchweigE.S. and Van ArsdaleR.B.1996. Neotectonics of the upper Mississippi embayment. Engineering Geology45, 185–203.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. StearnsR.G. and WilsonC.W.1972. Relationships of Earthquakes and Geology in West Tennessee and Adjacent Areas.Tennessee Valley Authority, Knoxville.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. StearnsR.G. and ZurawskiA.1976. Post‐Cretaceous faulting in the head of the Mississippi embayment. Southeastern Geology7, 207–229.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. SteeplesD.W.2001. Engineering and environmental geophysics at the millennium. Geophysics66, 31–35.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. TuttleM.P. and BarstowN.1996. Liquefaction‐related ground failure: A case study in the New Madrid seismic zone, central United States. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America86, 636–645.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. TuttleM.P. and SchweigS.E.1995. Archaeological and pedological evidence for large prehistoric earthquakes in the New Madrid seismic zone, central United States. Geology23, 253–256.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. TuttleM.P., SchweigS.E., SimsD.J., LaffertyH.R., WolfL.W. and HaynesL.M.2002. The earthquake potential of the New Madrid seismic zone. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America92, 2080–2089.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Van ArsdaleR.B. and TenBrinkR.K.2000. Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic geology of the New Madrid seismic zone. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America90, 345–356.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. VelascoM., Van ArsdaleR., WaldronB., HarrisJ. and CoxR.2005. Quaternary Faulting beneath Memphis, Tennessee. Seismological Research Letters76, 598–614.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. WebbersA.2003. Ground‐water use by public water‐supply systems in Tennessee, 2000. USGS Open‐File Report 03‐47.
  33. WilliamsR.A., StephensonJ.W., OdumK.J. and WorleyD.M.2001. Seismic reflection imaging of Tertiary faulting and related post Eocene deformation 20 km north of Memphis, TN. Engineering Geology62, 79–90.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. ZhangJ. and ToksözN.M.1998. Nonlinear refraction traveltime tomography. Geophysics63, 1726–1737.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2010025
Loading
Imaging a shallow aquitard with seismic reflection data in Memphis, Tennessee, USA. Part II: data analysis, interpretation and traveltime tomography
Near Surface Geophysics 8, 341 (2010); https://doi.org/10.3997/1873-0604.2010025
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2010025
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2010025
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error