1887
Volume 8, Issue 6
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604

Abstract

ABSTRACT

The detection of microseismic noise generated by survivors trapped by debris is a method already used by Search and Rescue (S&R) teams. Present seismic S&R equipment works exclusively on energy analysis whilst ignoring information associated with propagation delays. We explore the potential of using traveltime analysis compared to energy analysis for both 2D and 3D location. Results obtained from three different debris field scenarios used for training S&R teams demonstrate that using travel‐time information is more reliable than using energy information alone. A joint analysis of both signal parameters is suggested as an appropriate strategy to improve the reliability of locating survivors. Traveltimes can also potentially extend the location into the third dimension by returning an approximate estimate of the survivor depth below ground level. The main obstacles to achieving this goal are the inhomogeneity of the debris pile, the need for a real‐time response and the limited spatial extension of the sensor array. Despite these difficulties, results obtained in the field, with an algorithm based on energy focusing by means of cross‐correlation and semblance operators, show an accuracy within the limit of the seismic resolution. A new searching strategy is defined and the procedure reduces the investigation time taken by current seismic S&R systems by a factor of three.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2010051
2010-08-01
2024-04-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. ArosioD.2009. A microseismic approach to locate survivor in the wreckage of a disaster. PhD thesis. University of Pisa.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. ArosioD., GaranziniS. and ZanziL.2009. Geophysics and caving: An example from the Apuan Alps. 22nd Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Environmental and Engineering Problems (SAGEEP), Fort Worth, Texas, USA, Expanded Abstracts, 949–957.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BernasconiG. and RovettaD.2009. Automatic localization of acoustic sensors. 22nd Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Environmental and Engineering Problems (SAGEEP), Fort Worth, Texas, USA, Expanded Abstracts, 636–644.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. ChenK.‐M., HuangY., ZhangJ. and NormanA.2000. Microwave life‐detection system for searching human subjects under earthquake rubble or behind barrier. IEEE Transaction on Biomedical Engineering27, 105–114.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. CistD.B.2009. Non‐destructive evaluation after destruction: using ground penetrating radar for search and rescue. 7th International Symposium on Non‐Destructive Testing in Civil Engineering, Nantes, France, Expanded Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. EisnerL., AbbottD., BarkerW.B., LakingsJ. and ThorntonM.P.2008. Noise suppression for detection and location of microseismic events using a matched filter. 78th SEG meeting, Las Vegas, Texas, USA, Expanded Abstracts, 1431–1435.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. EisnerL., DuncanP., HeiglW. and KellerW.R.2009. Uncertainties in passive seismic monitoring. The Leading Edge28, 648–655.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Federal Emergency Management Agency
    Federal Emergency Management Agency2000. Urban Search and Rescue response system in federal disaster operations; Operations manual. PR 9356.1, US Department of Homeland Security.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. GajewskiD. and TessmerE.2005. Reverse modelling for seismic event characterization. Geophysical Journal International163, 276–284.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. GeM.2003a. Analysis of source location algorithms: Part I. Overview and non‐iterative methods. Journal of Acoustic Emission21, 14–28.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. GeM.2003b. Analysis of source location algorithms: Part II. Iterative methods. Journal of Acoustic Emission21, 29–51.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. GeM. and HardyH.R.Jr.1988. The mechanism of array geometry in the control of AE/MS source location accuracy. 29th US Symposium on Rock Mechanics, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, Expanded Abstracts, 597–605.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. GeigerL.1912. Probability method for the determination of earthquake epicentres from the arrival time only. Bulletin of the St. Louis University8, 60–71.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. HanafyS.M., CaoW., McCarterK. and SchusterG.T.2009. Using superstack and super‐resolution properties of time‐reversal mirrors to locate trapped survivors. The Leading Edge28, 302–307.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. HardyH.R.Jr.2003. Acoustic Emission/Microseismic Activity. Principles, Techniques, and Geotechnical Applications. Volume 1. A.A. Balkema.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. HusenS., KisslingE., DeichmannN., WiemerS., GiardiniD. and BaerM.2003. Probabilistic earthquake location in complex three‐dimensional velocity models: Application to Switzerland. Journal of Geophysical Research108, 2077.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. LeeW.H.K. and StewartS.W.1981. Principles and Applications of Microearthquake Networks.Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. LomaxA., VirieuxJ., VolantP. and Thierry‐BergeC.2000. Probabilistic earthquake location in 3D and layered models. In: Advances in Seismic Event Location (eds C.H.Thurber and N.Rabinowitz ), pp. 101–134. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. OppenheimA.V. and SchaferR.W.1989. Discrete‐time Signal Processing.Prentice‐Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. OyeV. and RothM.2003. Automated seismic event location for hydrocarbon reservoirs. Computers and Geosciences29, 851–863.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. PieracciniM., GrazziniG., DeiD. and AtzeniC.2008. GPR system to locate survivors of natural disasters. 12th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, Birmingham, UK, Expanded Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. RentschS., BuskeS., LüthS. and ShapiroA.2007. Fast location of seismicity: A migration‐type approach with application to hydraulic‐fracturing data. Geophysics72, S33–S40.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. TanerM.T., KoehlerF. and SheriffR.E.1979. Complex seismic trace analysis. Geophysics44, 1041–1063.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. VesnaverA., LovisaL. and BöhmG.2008. Full 3D relocation of microseisms for reservoir monitoring. 78th SEG meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada, YSA, Expanded Abstracts, 1441–1445.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. YilmazO.2001. Seismic Data Analysis: Processing, Inversion and Interpretation of Seismic Data. SEG.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2010051
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2010051
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error