1887
Volume 11 Number 2
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604

Abstract

ABSTRACT

The arrival time, shape and amplitude of a reflected GPR wavelet depend mainly on the real and imaginary parts of dielectrical permittivity and electrical conductivity. All these parameters are strongly affected by the water and clay content of soils. From a comparison of the amplitude and shape of the direct and reflected wavelets the quality factor can be determined independently as an additional soil parameter. To investigate the relationships between the influencing factors, we conducted high‐frequency GPR reflection measurements on soil samples with varying clay and water contents. The factor, derived from the spectral ratio method, is found to be between 5–15 for our samples that range from about 5–90% in sand content, 5–65% in silt content, 3–63% in clay content and 0–37% in pore water content. A multivariate non‐linear empirical function linking water and clay content to agrees well with the observations. We found that the ratio of the real and imaginary parts of the dielectric permittivity depends basically on the clay content. Therefore, it may become possible to determine the clay content of soils from a combination of GPR and conductivity measurements. The values determined from spectral ratios are confirmed by synthetic radargrams and agree with the observed decrease of the central frequency of GPR reflections caused by absorption.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2012025
2012-07-01
2020-07-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BanoM.1996. Constant dielectric losses of ground‐penetrating radar waves.Geophysical Journal International124, 279–288.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BanoM.2004. Modelling of GPR waves for lossy media obeying a complex power law of frequency for dielectric permittivity.Geophysical Prospecting52, 11–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BåthM.1974. Developments in Solid Earth Geophysics 7, Spectral Analysis in Geophysics.Elsevier Scientific Publication Company, 563.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BitriA. and GrandjeanG.1998. Frequency‐wavenumber modeling and migration of 2D GPR data in moderately heterogeneous dispersive media.Geophysical Prospecting46, 287–301.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. BradfordJ.H., HarperJ.T. and BrownJ.2009. Complex dielectric permittivity measurements from ground‐penetrating radar data to estimate snow liquid water content in the pendular regime.Water Resources Research45, W0840.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. ColeK.S. and ColeR.H.1941. Dispersion and absorption in dielectrics.Journal of Chemical Physics9, 341–351.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. DaiR. and YoungC.T.1997. Transient Fields of a Horizontal Electric Dipole on a Multilayered Dielectric Medium.IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation45(6), 1023–1031.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. DobsonM.C., UlabyF.T., HallikainenM.T. and El‐RayesM.A.1985. Microwave dielectric behaviour of wet soils – Part II: Dielectric mixing models.IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote SensingGE‐23(1), 35–46.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. GrandjeanG., GourryJ.C. and BitriA.2000. Evaluation of GPR techniques for civil‐engineering applications: Study on a test site.Journal of Applied Geophysics45, 141–156.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. HollenderF. and TillardS.1998. Modeling ground‐penetrating radar wave propagation and reflection with the Jonscher parameterization.Geophysics63(6), 1933–1942.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. IrvingJ.D. and KnightR.J.2003. Removal of wavelet dispersion from ground‐penetrating radar data.Geophysics68(3), 960–970.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. KlitzschN.2004. Ableitung von Gesteinseigenschaften aus Messungen der spektralen induzierten Polarisation (SIP) an Sedimentgesteinen.Dissertation, Leipzig University.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. KnightR.J. and EndresA.L.2005. Introduction to Rock Physics Principles for Near‐Surface Geophysics. In: Near Surface Geophysics (ed. D.K.Butler ), pp. 31–70. SEG.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. LiuL., LaneJ.W. and QuanY.1998. Radar attenuation tomography using the centroid frequency downshift method.Journal of Applied Geophysics40, 105–116.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. PeplinskiN.R., UlabyF.T. and DobsonM.C.1995. Dielectric Properties of Soils in the 0.3–1.3 GHz Range.IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing33(3), 803–807.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. PowersM.H.1997. Modeling frequency‐dependent GPR.The Leading Edge11, 1657–1662.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. SchwartzR.C., EvettS.R., PelletierM.G. and BellJ.M.2009. Complex permittivity model for time domain reflectometry soil water content sensing: I. Theory.Soil Science Society of America Journal73(3), 886–897.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. TanerM.T., KoehlerF. and SheriffR.E.1979. Complex seismic trace analysis.Geophysics44, 1041–1063.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. TonnR.1988. Die Bestimmung der seismischen Güte Q: Ein Vergleich unterschiedlicher Berechnungsmethoden.PhD Thesis, University of Kiel, Germany.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. TonnR.1991. The determination of the seismic quality factor Q from VSP data: A comparison of different computational methods.Geophysical Prospecting39, 1–27.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. TurnerG. and SigginsA.F.1994. Constant Q attenuation of subsurface radar pulses.Geophysics59(8), 1192–1200.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. TzanisA.2010. matGPR Release 2: A freeware MATLAB® package for the analysis & interpretation of common and single offset GPR data.FastTimes15(1), 17–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Van der KrukJ. and SlobE.2002. Effective Source Wavelet Determination.Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, Santa Barbara, USA, April 29–May 2, 2002, 144–149.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. WangJ.R. and SchmuggeT.J.1980. An empirical model for the complex dielectric permittivity of soils as a function of water content.IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote SensingGE‐18(4), 288–295.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. YelfR. and YelfD.2006. Where is True Time Zero?Electromagnetic Phenomena 7, 1(18), 159–163.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2012025
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2012025
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error