1887

Abstract

Summary

Polarization is an important property of seismic waves that specifies the direction of particle motion. A full polarization measurement system in 3D space could be exploited for passive seismic event detection, seismic direction finding, and wavefield filtering. Seismic sources with different moment tensors will cause polarization differences which could in principle be used for focal mechanism analysis, even for moment tensor inversion. Here, we simulate the 3D vectoral seismic data set for the six basic moment tensor sources which are then used for polarization analysis. Then, we analyze the polarization patterns (azimuth and inclination angle variations) for P and S waves over the ground surface for a buried source, taking into account polarity changes. The results show that the seismic waves from the different basic moment tensor sources have dissimilar polarization characteristics. Such patterns could be exploited to invert for the hypocenter location and the moment tensor of the source. We next consider an actual 3C borehole microseismic field data set and extract the polarization angle. It is clear that a much wider aperture monitoring system is required to sense rapid and/or appreciable angular changes in the polarization vector for effective moment tensor inversion.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202010034
2021-10-18
2024-04-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AkiK., RichardsP. G.
    , [2002] Quantitative seismology: theory and methods Freeman
    [Google Scholar]
  2. AmmariH., KangH.
    , [2007] Polarization and moment tensors with applications to inverse problems and effective medium theory.Springer Science & Business Media.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BatailleK, ChiuJ. M.
    , [1991] Polarization analysis of high-frequency, three-component seismic data.Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 81(2): 622–642.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. FalsaperlaS., WassermannJ. and ScherbaumF.
    , [2002] Polarization analyses of broadband seismic data recorded on Stromboli Volcano (Italy) from 1996 to 1999.Geophysical Research Letters, 29(10):29-1–29-4.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. GreenhalghS., SollbergerD., SchmelzbachC., et al.
    , [2018] Single-station polarization analysis applied to seismic wavefields: A tutorial.Advances in Geophysics, 59: 123–170.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. LiH., WangR., andCao S.
    , [2015] Microseismic forward modeling based on different focal mechanisms used by the seismic moment tensor and elastic wave equation, Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 12(2), 155–166.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. MeersmanK. D.
    , [2009] KendallJ M, BaanM V D. The 1998 Valhall microseismic data set: An integrated study of relocated sources, seismic multiplets, and S-wave splitting.Geophysics, 74(5): B183.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. PinnegarC. R.
    , [2006] Polarization analysis and polarization filtering of three-component signals with the time—frequency S transform:Geophysical Journal International, 165, 596–606.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202010034
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202010034
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error