1887

Abstract

Summary

From its initiation to propagation, opening and closing, a fracture is under continuous pressure as a result of coupled hydromechanical and geochemical processes. The combination of these processes, including for example dissolution and precipitation, karstification and shearing, leads to complex fracture surface geometries that resemble anything but the parallel plate representation that is typically assumed in fracture network models to calculate aperture and permeability.

Using a novel workflow for characterizing fracture roughness and aperture from core plugs, we aim to gain new insights into how different mechanical and chemical processes impact fracture roughness and how the resulting fracture surface geometry influences permeability of shear fractures in shales, to assess the leakage potential of natural fractures in CO2 storage site caprocks.

We make use of a digital microscope and python-based image processing and roughness quantification. The roughness parameters are correlated to permeability data to derive empirical relations for fracture flow modelling based on a known mineralogy and bedding orientation. The results are used to populate caprock leakage risk models in a joint industry research project for CO2 storage, but the methodology can also be applied to naturally fractured reservoirs.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202010037
2021-10-18
2024-04-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adler, P.M., Thovert, J.F., Mourzenko, V. V.
    , 2012. Fractured Porous Media. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bisdom, K., Bertotti, G., Nick, H.M.
    , 2016. The impact of different aperture distribution models and critical stress criteria on equivalent permeability in fractured rocks.Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth121, 4045–4063. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JB012657
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Carey, J.W., Frash, L.P.
    , 2017. Brittle-Ductile Behavior and Caprock Integrity.Energy Procedia114, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1441
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Frash, L.P., Carey, J.W., Ickes, T., Viswanathan, H.S.
    , 2017. Caprock integrity susceptibility to permeable fracture creation.International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control64, 60–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.06.010
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Gadelmawla, E.S., Koura, M.M., Maksoud, T.M.A., Elewa, I.M., Soliman, H.H.
    , 2002. Roughness parameters.Journal of Materials Processing Technology123, 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00060-2
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Gale, J.F.W., Laubach, S.E., Olson, J.E., Eichhuble, P., Fall, A.
    , 2014. Natural Fractures in shale: A review and new observations.AAPG Bulletin98, 2165–2216. https://doi.org/10.1306/08121413151
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Gale, J.F.W., Reed, R.M., Holder, J.
    , 2007. Natural fractures in the Barnett Shale and their importance for hydraulic fracture treatments.AAPG Bulletin91, 603–622. https://doi.org/10.1306/11010606061
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hale, S., Naab, C., Butscher, C., Blum, P.
    , 2019. Method Comparison to Determine Hydraulic Apertures of Natural Fractures.Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-019-01966-7
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Keyence
    , 2017. Digital Microscope VHX-6000 User’s Manual.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. van der Walt, S., Schönberger, J.L., Nunez-Iglesias, J., Boulogne, F., Warner, J.D., Yager, N., Gouillart, E., Yu, T.
    , 2014. scikit-image: image processing in Python.PeerJ2, e453. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.453
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202010037
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202010037
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error