1887

Abstract

Summary

This paper is written about Field Move Clino and FieldMove programs and their capabilities. We describe the features of processing in field works. Advantages and disadvantages of using gadgets during geological field camp are indicated. These thesis demonstrate that Move software is the right solution for field geological work.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20205706
2020-12-07
2024-04-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/2214-4609/2020/geoterrace-2020/GeoTerrace-2020-006-Oliinyk.html?itemId=/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20205706&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Allmendinger, R. W., Siron, C. R., & Scott, C. P.
    (2017). Structural data collection with mobile devices: Accuracy, redundancy, and best practices.Journal of Structural Geology, 102, 98–112.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Brush, J. A., Pavlis, T. L., Hurtado, J. M., Mason, K. A., Knott, J. R., & Williams, K. E.
    (2019). Evaluation of field methods for 3-D mapping and 3-D visualization of complex metamorphic structure using multiview stereo terrain models from ground-based photography.Geosphere, 15(1), 188–221.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bubniak, I. M., Bubniak, A. M., & Gavrilenko, O. D.
    (2020, May). Digital field geology. In Geoinformatics: Theoretical and Applied Aspects 2020 (Vol. 2020, No. 1, pp. 1–4). European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cawood, A. J., Bond, C. E., Howell, J. A., Butler, R. W., & Totake, Y.
    (2017). LiDAR, UAV or compass-clinometer? Accuracy, coverage and the effects on structural models.Journal of Structural Geology, 98, 67–82.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Lee, S., Suh, J., & Park, H. D.
    (2013). Smart Compass-Clinometer: A smartphone application for easy and rapid geological site investigation.Computers & Geosciences, 61, 32–42.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Lee, S., Suh, J., & Choi, Y.
    (2018). Review of smartphone applications for geoscience: current status, limitations, and future perspectives.Earth Science Informatics, 11(4), 463–486.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. McCarthy, A., Cosgrave, R., & Meere, P.
    (2009). Use of the iPhone as a geological field tool: Practical benefits and technical limitations.EGUGA, 11727
    [Google Scholar]
  8. MOVE structural geology software MOVE Core (Computer software).
    MOVE structural geology software MOVE Core (Computer software). (2020.). Retrieved from https://www.petex.com/products/move-suite/
  9. Novakova, L., & Pavlis, T. L.
    (2017). Assessment of the precision of smart phones and tablets for measurement of planar orientations: A case study.Journal of Structural Geology, 97, 93–103..
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Pavlis, T., Hurtado, J., Langford, R., & Serpa, L.
    (2014). Lessons in modern digital field geology: Open source software, 3D techniques, and the new world of digital mapping.EGUGA, 2470..
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Pavlis, T. L., Langford, R., Hurtado, J., & Serpa, L.
    (2010). Computer-based data acquisition and visualization systems in field geology: Results from 12 years of experimentation and future potential.Geosphere, 6(3), 275–294.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Sun, F., Weng, Y., & Grigsby, J. D.
    (2010). Smartphones for geological data collection-an android phone application.AGUFM, 2010, IN53B-1175.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Whitmeyer, S. J., Pyle, E. J., Pavlis, T. L., Swanger, W., & Roberts, L.
    (2019). Modern approaches to field data collection and mapping: Digital methods, crowdsourcing, and the future of statistical analyses.Journal of Structural Geology, 125, 29–40.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20205706
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20205706
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error