Modeling Lost-Circulation in Fractured Media Using Physics-Based Machine Learning

References

1. Ahmadi, M. A., Shadizadeh, S. R., Shah, K., and Bahadori, A. [2018]. An accurate model to predict drilling fluid density at wellbore conditions. Egyptian Journal of Petroleum, 27, 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpe.2016.12.002
   [Google Scholar]
2. Albattat, R., AlSinan, M., Kwak, H., and Hoteit, H. [2021]. Lost-circulation diagnostics using derivative-based type-curves for non-Newtonian mud leakage into fractured formation.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Albattat, R., and Hoteit, H. [2019]. Modeling yield-power-law drilling fluid loss in fractured formation. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 182(106273). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106273
   [Google Scholar]
4. Albattat, R., and Hoteit, H. [2021]. A semi-analytical approach to model drilling fluid leakage into fractured formation. Rheologica Acta, 60, 353–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00397-021-01275-3
   [Google Scholar]
5. Alkinani, H. H., Al-Hameedi, A., and Dunn-Norman, S. [2020]. Data–driven decision–making for lost circulation treatments: A machine learning approach. Energy and AI, 2(100031). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyai.2020.100031
   [Google Scholar]
6. He, X., Zhu, W., Santoso, R., Alsinan, M., Kwak, H., and Hoteit, H. [2021a]. CO2 Leakage Rate Forecasting Using Optimized Deep Learning. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. https://doi.org/10.2118/206222-MS
   [Google Scholar]
7. He, X., Zhu, W., Santoso, R., Alsinan, M., Kwak, H., and Hoteit, H. [2021b]. Fracture Permeability Estimation Under Complex Physics: A Data-Driven Model Using Machine Learning. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. https://doi.org/10.2118/206352-MS
   [Google Scholar]
8. Ibrahim, M., Al-Sobhi, S., Mukherjee, R., and AlNouss, A. [2019]. Impact of sampling technique on the performance of surrogate models generated with artificial neural network (ANN): A case study for a natural gas stabilization unit. Energies, 12, 1906.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Lee, J. H., Ko, Y. D., Yun, I. G., and Han, K. H. [2006]. Comparison of Latin Hypercube Sampling and Simple Random Sampling Applied to Neural Network Modeling of HfO 2 Thin Film Fabrication. Transactions on Electrical and Electronic Materials, 7, 210–214.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Lothe, A., Cerasi, P., Haavardstein, S., and Bjorkvoll, K. S. [2017, March 19]. Workflow for Uncertainty Modelling of Pore Pressure and Mud Weight Window ahead of Bit - Example of Pre-drill Results from the North Sea. First EAGE Workshop on Pore Pressure Prediction. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201700075
    [Google Scholar]
11. Mardanirad, S., Wood, D. A., and Zakeri, H. [2021]. The application of deep learning algorithms to classify subsurface drilling lost circulation severity in large oil field datasets. SN Applied Sciences, 3, 785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-021-04769-0
    [Google Scholar]
12. Pang, H., Meng, H., Wang, H., Fan, Y., Nie, Z., and Jin, Y. [2022]. Lost circulation prediction based on machine learning. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 208(109364). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109364
    [Google Scholar]
13. Sabah, M., Mehrad, M., Ashrafi, S. B., Wood, D. A., and Fathi, S. [2021]. Hybrid machine learning algorithms to enhance lost-circulation prediction and management in the Marun oil field. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 198(108125). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2020.108125
    [Google Scholar]