1887
Volume 22, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604

Abstract

Abstract

Ground‐penetrating radar (GPR) technology is widely used in tunnel engineering detection; however, various factors, such as environmental interference and low signal‐to‐noise ratio characteristics of the echo data, limit the detection accuracy. A noise and interference suppression algorithm based on improved singular value decomposition is proposed in this paper. Compared with traditional filtering methods, the proposed method has the advantages of thorough denoising, no clutter, efficient improvement of profile resolution and less dependence on parameters. The main features of the proposed algorithm are as follows. (1) Given the global characteristics of the noise disturbance on the signal space, the minimum mean square error estimation is employed to approximate the effective signal, introducing the correction factor to suppress the larger singular value from the noise output in the reconstructing process of the effective signal subspace and to eliminate the strong direct wave interference to avoid producing false signals. (2) A positive difference sequence search algorithm based on rank order variance as well as the method of selecting correction factors are proposed to improve the processing accuracy. In order to verify the design, the tunnel lining simulation model and the actual tunnel lining detection data are used. The results show good performance for noise and interference suppression, providing technical support for improving GPR data quality and tunnel detection accuracy.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1002/nsg.12279
2024-01-17
2024-04-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bao, Q., Chen, W., Gao, J. & Wang, W. (2008) Direct wave attenuation technique of GPR by curvelet transform. Journal of Radio Science, 3, 449–454.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Chen, G., Chen, K., Lou, K., Yang, C. & Dai, M. (2017) Research on adaptive ground penetrating radar data denoising technology based on SVD. In: Proceedings of the 15th National Conference on engineering geophysical exploration and geotechnical engineering testing. Geotechnical Investigation & Surveying (supplementary issue) (2), 263–270.
  3. Cheng, Z., He, F., Jing, X., Zhang, S. & Hou, Z. (2017) Denoising lidar signal based on ensemble empirical mode decomposition and singular value decomposition. Acta Photonica Sinica, 46(12), 147–157.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cui, W., Xu, A., Li, W. & Meng, F. (2017) A new method for determining effective rank order of singular value decomposition denoising based on fitting error minimum principle. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 36(3), 132–137.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. De Moor, B. (1993) The singular value decomposition and long and short spaces of noisy matrices. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 41(9), 2826–2838.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Feng, D., Liu, S., Yang, J., Wang, X. & Wang, X. (2021) The noise attenuation and stochastic clutter removal of ground penetrating radar based on the K‐SVD dictionary learning. IEEE Access: Practical Innovations, Open Solutions, 9, 74879–74890.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Gao, Y., An, H., Wu, S. & Su, Z. (2011) A novel method of removing random noises in seismic data processing based on Wiener filter. Petroleum Instruments, 25(3), 16–17.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Johnson, M.T. & Povinelli, R.J. (2005) Generalized phase space projection for nonlinear noise reduction. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 201(3), 306–317.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Li, W., Wei, X., Liu, Y., Wu, C. & Zhang, C. (2004) Application of SVD filtering method in direct wave and refraction wave attenuation processing. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 5, 71–73.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Lu, G., Luo, S., Zhu, Z., Zhao, Y. & Xi, F. (2019) Application of random noise suppression method based on two‐dimensional wavelet transform in GPR data. Computing Techniques for Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 41(2), 234–240.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Peng, Y., Liu, G., Su, Y., Liu, Y. & Zhang, C. (2021) A smooth denoising model of tunnel blasting vibration signal based on VMD. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 40(24), 173–179.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Peng, J., Zhong, J., Bai, J., Meng, X. & Wang, H. (2021) Study on ground penetrating radar clutter suppression method by background matrix subtraction. Mineral Resources and Geology, 35(1), 141–147.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Tang, J., Cao, H., Wang, L. & Wu, Y. (2005) Median filtering in seismic crosshole data processing. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 44(1), 47–50.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Tian, J., Li, P., Wang, W., Ma, J., Sun, G. & Wang, H. (2022) Quantitative identification of internal and external wire rope damage based on VMD‐AWT noise reduction and PSO‐SVM. Entropy, 24(7), 981.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Wang, Y., Wang, L., Wei, L. & Han, X. (2018) Scale analysis of GPR signal denoising based on db4 wavelet base threshold. Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 48(22), 114–119.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Wang, S., Lin, Y., Meng, Y. & Gao, Z. (2012) Model order determination based on singular value decomposition. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 31(15), 87–91.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Wang, Z., Wang, J., Chen, K., Li, Z., Xu, J., Li, Y. et al. (2023) Unsupervised learning method for rebar signal suppression and defect signal reconstruction and detection in ground penetrating radar images. Measurement, 211, 112652.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Wu, R., Zhang, S. & Wu, H. (2021) Comparative analysis on ground penetrating radar data denoising by different wavelet basis within salt and pepper noise. Journal of Anhui University of Science and Technology (Natural Science), 41(6),13–18.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Xiao, Y., Li, B. & Cao, M. (2021) Research on denoising of power harmonic signal based on wavelet threshold. Electrical Measurement Instrumentation, 1–7. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/23.1202.TH.20211029.0936.002.html
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Xie, B., Yang, L. & Chen, Q. (2016) Improved adaptive linear minimum mean square error channel estimation algorithm in discrete wavelet transform domain based on empirical mode decomposition‐singular value decomposition difference spectrum. Journal of Computer Applications, 36(11), 3033–3038.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Yang, H. & Han, Y. (2021) Research on noise reduction of gear root crack signal of vehicle transmission based on SVD method. Automation & Instrumentation, 3, 65–69.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Yu, H. (2015) Ground penetrating radar signal clutter suppression based on wavelet and ridgelet transform. Electronic Science and Technology, 28(7), 1–4.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Zhang, S., Wu, R., Han, Z. & Wu, H. (2021) The application of bilateral filtering to denoise processing of ground penetrating radar data. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2, 496–501.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhao, B. & Li, H. (2022) Research on vibration signal noise reduction method combining EMD and LSF. Journal of Vibration, Measurement & Diagnosis, 42(3), 606–610+624.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Zhao, X. & Ye, B. (2017) The relationship between non‐zero singular values and frequencies and its application to signal decomposition. Acta Electronica Sinica, 45(8), 2008–2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Zheng, X., Zhang, Y., Li, J. & Zhang, L. (2022) Study on the signal denoising of the rotating machinery based on the variational mode decomposition and the cross‐correlation analysis. Nuclear Science and Engineering, 42(2), 342–352.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Zheng, J., Liu, W., Ma, N. & Chen, X. (2018) Clutter reduction for ground penetrating radar signal. Electronic Measurement Technology, 41(21), 63–66.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Zheng, J., Yu, K., Wang, P., Jiang, S. & Teng, X. (2017) GPR data noise attenuation based on the shearlet transform. Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 2(3), 228–234.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Zhu, Z., Wang, Y. & Lu, G. (2017) Application of S transform in data processing of detection of tunnel lining by ground penetrating radar. Computing Techniques for Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 39(6), 755–761.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1002/nsg.12279
Loading
/content/journals/10.1002/nsg.12279
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error