1887
Volume 28, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 1354-0793
  • E-ISSN:
PDF

Abstract

This work presents a new open-source carbonate reservoir case study, the COSTA model, that uniquely considers significant uncertainties inherent to carbonate reservoirs, providing a far more challenging and realistic benchmarking test for a range of geo-energy applications. The COSTA field is large, with many wells and large associated volumes. The dataset embeds many interacting geological and petrophysical uncertainties in an ensemble of model concepts with realistic geological and model complexity levels and varying production profiles. The resulting number of different models and long run times creates a more demanding computational challenge than current benchmarking models.

The COSTA model takes inspiration from the shelf-to-basin geological setting of the Upper Kharaib Member (Early Cretaceous), one of the most prolific aggradational parasequence carbonate formations sets in the world. The dataset is based on 43 wells and the corresponding fully anonymised data from the northeastern part of the Rub Al Khali basin, a sub-basin of the wider Arabian Basin. Our model encapsulates the large-scale geological setting and reservoir heterogeneities found across the shelf-to-basin profile, into one single model, for geological modelling and reservoir simulation studies.

The result of this research is a semi-synthetic but geologically realistic suite of carbonate reservoir models that capture a wide range of geological, petrophysical, and geomodelling uncertainties and that can be history-matched against an undisclosed, synthetic ‘truth case’. The models and dataset are made available as open-source to analyse several issues related to testing new numerical algorithms for geological modelling, uncertainty quantification, reservoir simulation, history matching, optimization and machine learning.

supplementary data associated with this article can be found in the data repository for the COSTA model available at https://doi.org/10.17861/6e36e28d-50d9-4e31-9790-18db4bce6e5d and supplementary material is available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5823571

[open-access]

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2021-067
2022-04-21
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/pg/28/3/petgeo2021-067.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2021-067&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Ajayi, T., Awolayo, A., Gomes, J.S., Parra, H. and Hu, J. 2019. Large scale modeling and assessment of the feasibility of CO2 storage onshore Abu Dhabi. Energy, 185, 653–670, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.07.052
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Al Blooshi, M.2018. Fracture-Related Diagenesis: A Record of Fluid Flow Through the Thamama Group, UAE.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Ali, M., Aidarbayev, S., Searle, M. and Watts, A.2017. Subsidence History and Seismic Stratigraphy of the Western Musandam Peninsula, Oman-United Arab Emirates Mountains.
  4. Al Mansoori, A.I., Strohmenger, C.J., Ghani, A.A.M.A. and Mitchell, J.2008. High-resolution sequence-stratigraphic correlation and facies characterization of Upper Thamama (Lower Cretaceous) reservoir units and non-reservoir zones, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, Abu Dhabi, UAE, November 2008, SPE-117905-MS, https://doi.org/10.2118/117905-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Alsharhan, A.S. 1993. Asab Field--United Arab Emirates, Rub Al Khali Basin, Abu Dhabi. AAPG Special Volumes (TR: Structural Traps VIII), 28.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Alsharhan, A.S. 2014. Petroleum systems in the Middle East. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 392, 361–408, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP392.19
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Arnold, D., Demyanov, V., Tatum, D., Christie, M., Rojas, T., Geiger, S. and Corbett, P. 2013. Hierarchical benchmark case study for history matching, uncertainty quantification and reservoir characterisation. Computers & Geosciences, 50, 4–15, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2012.09.011
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bentley, M. 2016. Modelling for comfort?Petroleum Geoscience, 22, 3–10, https://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo2014-089
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Brooks, R.H. and Corey, A.T.1964. Hydraulic Properties of Porous Media. Hydrology Papers. Colorado State University.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Buchem, F., Al-Husseini, M., Maurer, F. and Droste, H.2010a. Barremian–Aptian Stratigraphy and Hydrocarbon Habitat of the Eastern Arabian Plate - Volume I. Gulf Petrolink, Bahrain.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Buchem, F., Al-Husseini, M., Maurer, F. and Droste, H.2010b. Barremian–Aptian Stratigraphy and Hydrocarbon Habitat of the Eastern Arabian Plate - Volume II. Gulf Petrolink, Bahrain.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Carvalho, A., Dias, A. and Riberio, M.2011. Oil recovery enhancement for Thamama B Lower in an Onshore Abu Dhabi Field. Using conceptual models to understand reservoir behaviour. SPE Reservoir Characterisation and Simulation Conference and Exhibition, October 2011, Abu Dhabi, UAE, SPE-148268-MS, https://doi.org/10.2118/148268-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Castro, S., Caers, J. and Mukerji, T.2005. The Stanford vi Reservoir. Stanford Center for Reservoir Forecasting (SCRF), Annual Report, 153–154.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Christie, M. and Blunt, M.2001. Tenth SPE comparative solution project: a comparison of upscaling techniques. SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium. Society of Petroleum Engineers, 4, 308–317, SPE-72469-PA, https://doi.org/10.2118/72469-PA
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Correia, M., Hohendorff, J., Gaspar, A.T.F.S. and Schiozer, D.2015. UNISIM-II-D: benchmark case proposal based on a carbonate reservoir. SPE: Society of Petroleum Engineers, 18 November.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Correia, M., Botechia, V. et al.2020. UNISIM-III: benchmark case proposal based on a fractured karst reservoir. ECMOR XVII. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202035018
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Costa Gomes, J., Geiger, S. and Arnold, D.P.2019a. A hierarchical carbonate reservoir benchmarking case study for reservoir characterisation, uncertainty quantification & history matching. 81st EAGE Conference and Exhibition. EAGE, London, 1206, https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201901631
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Costa Gomes, J., Geiger, S. and Arnold, D.P.2019b. An open access carbonate reservoir benchmarking study for reservoir characterisation, uncertainty quantification & history matching. SPE Reservoir Characterisation and Simulation Conference and Exhibition, 17 September, Abu Dhabi, UAE. SPE: Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE-196674-MS, https://doi.org/10.2118/196674-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Costa Gomes, J., Geiger, S. and Arnold, D.2020. Using synthetic production data from an open source carbonate reservoir model to improve our understanding of flow behaviour. SPE Europec. D011S006R003, https://doi.org/10.2118/200586-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Cutts, P.L. 1991. The maureen field, block 16/29a, UK North Sea. Geological Society, London, Memoirs, 14, 347–352, https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.MEM.1991.014.01.43
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Davies, R.B., Casey, D.M., Horbury, A.D., Sharland, P.R. and Simmons, M.D. 2002. Early to mid-Cretaceous mixed carbonate-clastic shelfal systems: examples, issues and models from the Arabian Plate. GeoArabia, 7, 541–598, https://doi.org/10.2113/geoarabia0703541
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Dunnington, H.V.1967. Aspects of diagenesis and shape change in stylolitic limestone reservoirs. 7th World Petroleum Congress, 1 January, Mexico City, Mexico. WPC: World Petroleum Congress, 14.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Ehrenberg, S.N. and Wu, Q. 2019. Dense zones of the Kharaib Formation (Lower Cretaceous), United Arab Emirates. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 89, 353–380, https://doi.org/10.2110/jsr.2019.20
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Ehrenberg, S.N., Aqrawi, A.A.M. and Nadeau, P.H. 2008. An overview of reservoir quality in producing Cretaceous strata of the Middle East. Petroleum Geoscience, 14, 307–318, https://doi.org/10.1144/1354-079308-783
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Ehrenberg, S.N., Zhang, J. and Gomes, J.S. 2020a. Regional porosity variation in Thamama-B reservoirs of Abu Dhabi. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 114, 104245, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2020.104245
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Ehrenberg, S.N., Zhang, J. and Gomes, J.S. 2020b. Regional variation of permeability in Thamama-B reservoirs of Abu Dhabi. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 116, 104248, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2020.104248
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Equinor2018. Volve field dataset, https://www.equinor.com/en/what-we-do/digitalisation-in-our-dna/volve-field-data-village-download.html
  28. Ferran Pacheco, M.H., Chatterjee, S. et al.2019. Integrated sedimentological and seismic reservoir characterization studies as inputs into a Lower Cretaceous reservoir geomodel, offshore Abu Dhabi. First Break, 37, 73–84, https://doi.org/10.3997/1365-2397.2019027
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Grotsch, J., Al-Jelani, O. and Al-Mehairi, Y.1998. Integrated reservoir characterisation of a giant lower cretaceous oil field, Abu Dhabi, U.A.E. Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, 11–14 November, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Copyright 1998, Society of Petroleum Engineers Inc, https://doi.org/10.2118/49454-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Harris, T.J., Hay, J.T.C. and Twombley, B.N.1968. Contrasting limestone reservoirs in the Murban field, Abu Dhabi. Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, 149–187.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Harrison, B. and Jing, X.2001. Saturation height methods and their impact on volumetric hydrocarbon in place estimates, https://doi.org/10.2118/71326-MS
  32. Jeong, J., Al-Ali, A.A. et al.2017. Controls on reservoir quality and reservoir architecture of early cretaceous carbonates in an Abu Dhabi onshore field Lekhwair, Kharaib and Lower Shuaiba Formations. SPE: Society of Petroleum Engineers, November 2017, https://doi.org/10.2118/188420-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Jingjing, Z., Ehrenberg, S.N., Alsuwaidi, M. and Tao, G.2018. Regional Study of Diagenesis and Reservoir Quality in the Thamama-B Reservoir, Abu Dhabi. Khalifa University, United Arab Emirates, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2020.104248
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Journel, A.G. and Huijbregts, C.J.1978. Mining Geostatistics. Academic P, London.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Koppen, J.v., Al-Menhali, H. et al.2015. Geological mapping of early diagenetic bodies as a tool to distribute permeability in a mature giant carbonate field. Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, Abu Dhabi, UAE, 9 November. SPE: Society of Petroleum Engineers, https://doi.org/10.2118/177850-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Lawrence, D.A., Al Ali, M. et al.2010. Sequence stratigraphy of a giant middle east oil field - integration of core, log and seismic data. SPE: Society of Petroleum Engineers, November 2010, https://doi.org/10.2118/138467-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Lucia, F.J.1999. Carbonate Reservoir Characterization: An Integrated Approach. Springer Science & Business Media.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Maalouf, C.B., Espinoza, I.B., Afzal, N.A., Gomes, J.C. and Al-Jaberi, S.2016. Reservoir Characterization of Water Zone above Oil-Water Contact in a Carbonate Reservoir, Offshore Abu Dhabi.
  39. Melville, P., Al Jeelani, O., Al Menhali, S. and Grötsch, J.2005. Three-dimensional seismic analysis in the characterization of a giant carbonate field, onshore Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
  40. Møyner, O., Krogstad, S. and Lie, K.-A. 2015. The application of flow diagnostics for reservoir management. SPE Journal, 20, 306–323, https://doi.org/10.2118/171557-PA
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Oswald, E., Mueller III, H., Goff, D., Al-Habshi, H. and Al-Matroushi, S.1995. Controls on porosity evolution in Thamama Group carbonate reservoirs in Abu Dhabi, UAE. Middle East Oil Show. Society of Petroleum Engineers, https://doi.org/10.2118/29797-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Paganoni, M., Al Harethi, A. et al.2015. Impact of Stylolitization on Diagenesis and Reservoir Quality: A Case Study from an Early Cretaceous Reservoir in a Giant Oilfield, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
  43. Pyrcz, M. and Deutsch, C.2003. The Whole Story on the Hole Effect. Geostatistical Association of Australasia, Newsletter.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Rider, M.H.1996. The Geological Interpretation of Well Logs, 2nd edn. Gulf Publishing, United States.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Ringrose, P. and Bentley, M.2015. Reservoir Model Design. Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Saadawi, H.N.2006. Commissioning of Northeast Bab (NEB) Development Project. Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers, https://doi.org/10.2118/102068-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Scheidt, C. and Caers, J. 2009. Uncertainty quantification in reservoir performance using distances and Kernel methods--application to a West Africa Deepwater Turbidite Reservoir. SPE Journal, 14, 680–692, https://doi.org/10.2118/118740-PA
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Skjaeveland, S.M., Siqveland, L.M., Kjosavik, A., Thomas, W.L.H. and Virnovsky, G.A. 2000. Capillary pressure correlation for mixed-wet reservoirs. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 3, 60–67, https://doi.org/10.2118/60900-PA
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Statoil2005. Norne Reservoir Simulation Model. (Udated Reference Case).
  50. Strohmenger, C.J., Weber, L.J.J. et al.2004. High-resolution sequence stratigraphy of the Kharaib Formation (Lower Cretaceous, U.A.E.). SPE: Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1 January.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Strohmenger, C.J., Weber, L.J. et al.2006. High-resolution sequence stratigraphy and reservoir characterization of Upper Thamama (Lower Cretaceous) Reservoirs of a giant Abu Dhabi oil field, United Arab Emirates. In: AAPG Memoir 88/SEPM Special Publications, (Fromrocks to reservoir characterization and modeling), 139–171, https://doi.org/10.1306/1215876M883271
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Strohmenger, C.J., Al-Dayyani, T., Clark, A.B.S., Ghani, A.A. and Hafez, H.H.2007. Sequence stratigraphy-based geological modeling of upper Thamama (Lower Cretaceous) reservoirs of a giant Abu Dhabi Oil Field, United Arab Emirates. SPE/EAGE Reservoir Characterization and Simulation Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers, https://doi.org/10.2118/111401-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Venkitadri, V.S., Shebl, H.T., Shibasaki, T., Dabbouk, C.A. and Salman, S.M.2005. Reservoir rock type definition in a giant cretaceous carbonate. SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference, 1 January, Kingdom of Bahrain. SPE: Society of Petroleum Engineers, https://doi.org/10.2118/93477-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Wazir, Z.E., Madani, N.A., Omobude, O.A. and Alhoot, A.R.2015. Facies, deposition and diagenesis characteristics of The Upper Kharaib Member (Late Barremian), Onshore Abu Dhabi, UAE. SPE: Society of Petroleum Engineers, 9 November, https://doi.org/10.2118/177859-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Wu, Q. and Ehrenberg, N.2016. Sedimentology and Diagenesis of “dense zones” Above and Below the Thamama B Reservoir, Kharaib Formation (Lower Cretaceous) in Sahil Field, Abu Dhabi. The Petroleum Institute United Arab Emirates, https://doi.org/10.2118/183271-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Yin, Y., Lawrence, D.A., Vahrenkamp, V.C., Kourbaj, A., Mohamed, H., Gashut, M.A. and Al-Mehairi, Y.S.2010. Seismic characterization of reservoir architecture and facies distribution in a carbonate platform setting: dynamic implications for production in a super-giant Middle East Field. SPE: Society of Petroleum Engineers, November 2010, https://doi.org/10.2118/137301-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Yose, L.A., Ruf, A.S. et al.2006. Three-dimensional characterization of a heterogeneous carbonate reservoir, Lower Cretaceous, Abu Dhabi (United Arab Emirates). AAPG Memoir 88/SEPM Special Publications(Giant hydrocarbon reservoirs of the world: From rocks to reservoir characterization and modeling), 173–212, https://doi.org/10.1306/1215877M882562
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2021-067
Loading
/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2021-067
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error