1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Near Surface Geophysics
  4. Volume 5, Issue 3
  5. Article
Volume 5 Number 3
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604

Abstract

The characterization of the vadose zone, i.e. the part of the subsurface above the water table, is a challenging task. This zone is difficult to access with direct methods without causing major disturbance to the natural conditions. Hence the increasing use of geophysical methods capable of imaging the water presence in the vadose zone, such as ground‐penetrating radar (GPR) and electrical resistivity tomography (ERT). This type of monitoring can be applied both to processes of natural infiltration and to artificial injection (tracer) tests, by collecting multiple data sets through time (time‐lapse mode). We present the results of a water‐injection experiment conducted at a test site in Gorgonzola, east of Milan (Italy). The site is characterized by Quaternary sand and gravel sediments that house an extensive unconfined aquifer, potentially subject to pollution from industrial and agricultural sources. ERT and GPR profiles were acquired in 2D cross‐hole configuration and time‐lapse mode over a period of several days preceding and following the injection of 3.5 m3 of fresh water in a purpose‐excavated trench. A 3D model of the water‐infiltration experiment was calibrated against the time‐lapse cross‐hole data, particularly focusing on the ability of the model to reproduce the vertical motion of the centre of mass of the injected water as imaged by GPR and ERT. This model calibration provided an estimate of the isotropic hydraulic conductivity of the sediments in the range of 5–10 m/d. However, all isotropic models overpredict the measured excess of moisture content, caused by water injection, as imaged by GPR. The calibration of anisotropic models for the vertical hydraulic conductivity, with the horizontal hydraulic conductivity determined by direct measurement, also leads to a good fit of the sinking of the centre of mass, with a better mass balance in comparison with field data. The information derived from the experiment is key to a quantitative assessment of aquifer vulnerability to pollutants infiltrating from the surface.

© European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers © 2007 European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2006030
2018-12-18
2024-04-27

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2006030
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AlumbaughD., ChangP.Y., PaprockL. I., BrainardI.R., GlassR.J. and RautmanC.A.2002. Estimating moisture contents in the vadose zone using cross‐borehole ground penetrating radar: A study of accuracy and repeatability. Water Resources Research38 (12), 1309, doi: 10.1029/2001WR000754.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. AnnanA.P.2005. GPR Methods for Hydrogeological Studies . Springer Hydrogeophysics Series: Water Science and Technology Library50 (eds Y.Rubin and S.S.Hubbard ).
     [Google Scholar]
  3. ArchieG.E.1942.
  4. BinleyA.M., CassianiG., MiddletonR., and WinshipP.2002b. Vadose zone flow model parameterisation using cross‐borehole radar and resistivity imaging. Journal of Hydrology267(3–4), 147–159.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. BingZ. and GreenhalghS.A.2000. Cross‐hole resistivity tomography using different electrode configurations. Geophysical Prospecting48, 887–912.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. BinleyA.M., Henry‐PoulterS. and ShawB.1996. Examination of solute transport in an undisturbed soil column using electrical resistance tomography. Water Resources Research32 (4), 763–770.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. BinleyA.M. and KemnaA.2005. DC Resistivity and Induced Polarization Methods . Springer Hydrogeophysics Series: Water Science and Technology Library50, (eds Y.Rubin and S.S.Hubbard ).
     [Google Scholar]
  8. BinleyA.M., WinshipP., MiddletonR., PokarM. and WestJ.2001. High resolution characterization of vadose zone dynamics using cross‐borehole radar. Water Resources Research37(11), 2639–2652.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. BinleyA.M., WinshipP., WestL.J., PokarM. and MiddletonR.2002a. Seasonal variation of moisture content in unsaturated sandstone inferred from borehole radar and resistivity profiles. Journal of Hydrology267(3–4), 160–172.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. CassianiG. and BinleyA.M.2005. Modeling unsaturated flow in a layered formation under quasi‐steady state conditions using geophysical data constraints. Advances in Water Resources28(5), 467–477.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. CassianiG., BinleyA.M. and FerréT.P.A.2006a. Unsaturated Zone Processes. Applied Hydrogeophysics (eds H.Vereecken et al.), IV Earth and Environmental Sciences, Nato Science Series.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. CassianiG., BrunoV., VillaA., FusiN. and BinleyA.M.2006c. A saline tracer test monitored via time‐lapse surface electrical resistivity tomography. Journal of Applied Geophysics59(3), 244–259.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. CassianiG., StrobbiaC. and GallottiL.2004. Vertical radar profiles for the characterization of deep vadose zones. Vadose Zone Journal3, 1093–1115.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. CassianiG., StrobbiaC., GiustinianiM., FusiN., CrostaG.B. and FrattiniP.2006b. Monitoring of hydrological hillslope processes via time‐lapse ground‐penetrating radar. Bollettino di Geofísica Teorica ed Applicata47 (1–2), 125–144.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. ChanC. Y. and KnightR. J.1999. Determining water content from dielectric measurements in layered materials. Water Resources Research35(1), 85–93.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. ChelidzeT.L. and GueguenY.1999. Electrical spectroscopy of porous rocks: a review‐ I. Theoretical models. Geophysical Journal International137(1), 1–15.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. ConstableS.C., ParkerR.L. and ConstableC.G.1987. Occam’s inversion: A practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data. Geophysics52, 289–300.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. DailyW.D., LinW. and BuscheckT.1987. Hydrological properties of TOPOPAH Spring tuff – Laboratory measurements. Journal of Geophysical Research92, 7854–7864.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. DailyW., RamirezA. and BinleyA.2004b. Remote monitoring of leaks in storage tanks using electrical resistance tomography: application at the Hanford site. Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics9(1), 11–24.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. DailyW., RamirezA., BinleyA. and LaBrecqueD.2004a. Electrical resistance tomography. The Leading Edge23(5), 438–442.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. DailyW., RamirezA., BinleyA. and LaBrecqueD.2005. Electrical Resistance Tomography – Theory and Practice . Near‐Surface Geophysics, Investigations in Geophysics13, (ed. D.K.Butler ), pp. 525–550. Society of Exploration Geophysicists Monographs.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. DailyW.D., RamirezA.L., LaBrecqueD.J. and NitaoJ.1992. Electrical resistivity tomography of vadose water movement. Water Resources Research28(5), 1429–1442.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. DanielsJ.J., AllredB., BinleyA., LaBrecqueD. and AlumbaughD.2005. Hydrogeophysical Case Studies in the Vadose Zone . Springer Hydrogeophysics Series: Water Science and Technology Library50 (eds Y.Rubin Y. and S.S.Hubbard ).
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Day‐LewisF.D. and. LaneJ.WJr.2004. Assessing the resolution‐dependent utility of tomograms for geostatistics. Geophysical Research Letters31, L07503, doi:10.1029/2004GL019617.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Day‐LewisF., SinghaK. and BinleyA.2005. On the limitations of applying petrophysical models to tomograms:a comparison of correlation loss for cross‐hole electrical‐resistivity and radar tomography. Journal of Geophysical Research110 (B8), B08206, 10.1029/2004JB003569.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. EppsteinM.J. and DoughertyD.E.1998. Efficient three‐dimensional data inversion: Soil characterization and moisture monitoring from cross‐well ground‐penetrating radar at the Vermont test site. Water Resources Research34(8), 1889–1900.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. FluryM., FluhlerH., JuryW.A. and LeuenbergerJ.1994. Susceptibility of soils to preferential flow of water: A field study. Water Resources Research30(7), 1945–1954.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. FrenchH.K., HardbattleC., BinleyA., WinshipP. and JakobsenL.2002. Monitoring snowmelt induced unsaturated flow and transport using electrical resistivity tomography. Journal of Hydrology267(3–4), 273–284.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. GroteK., HubbardS. and RubinY.2003. Field‐scale estimation of volumetric water content using ground‐penetrating‐radar wave techniques. Water Resources Research39(11), 1321, doi:10.1029/2003WR002045.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. HubbardS.S., PetersonJ.E.Jr., MajerE.L., ZawislanskiP.T., WilliamsK.H., RobertsJ. and WobberF.1997. Estimation of permeable pathways and water content using tomographic radar data. The Leading Edge16(11), 1623–1628.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. HuismanJ.A., HubbardS.S., RedmanJ.D. and AnnanA.P.2003. Measuring soil water content with Ground Penetrating Radar: a review. Vadose Zone Journal2, 477–491.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. HuismanJ.A., SnepvangersJ.J.J.C., BoutenW. and HeuvelinkG.B.M.2002, Mapping spatial variation of surface soil water content: comparison of ground‐penetrating radar and time domain reflectometry. Journal of Hydrology269, 194–207.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. HuismanJ.A., SperlC., BoutenW. and VerstratenJ.M.2001. Soil water content measurements at different scales: Accuracy of time domain reflectometry and ground‐penetrating radar. Journal of Hydrology245(1–4), 48–58.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. IrvingJ.D. and KnightR.J.2005. Effects of antennas on velocity estimates obtained from cross‐hole GPR data. Geophysics70(5) K39–K42, 10.1190/1.2049349.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. JacksonM.J. and TweetonD.R.1994. MIGRATOM – Geophysical tomography using wavefront migration and fuzzy constraints . USBM Report of Investigation 9497, 35.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. KemnaA.2000. Tomographic inversion of complex resistivity: theory and application . PhD dissertation, University of Bochum, Germany.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. KemnaA., VanderborghtJ., KulessaB. and VereeckenH.2002. Imaging and characterisation of subsurface solute transport using electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and equivalent transport models. Journal of Hydrology267(3–4), 125–146.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. LaBrecqueD.J., MilettoM., DailyW.D., RamirezA.L. and OwenE.1996. The effects of noise on Occam’s inversion of resistivity tomography data. Geophysics61, 538–548.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. LaBrecqueD.J. and YangX.2000. Difference inversion of ERT data: a fast inversion method for 3‐D in‐situ monitoring. Proceedings of Symposium on Applied Geophysics, Engineering and Environmental Problems, pp.723–732. Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. LesmesD.P. and FriedmanS.P.2005. Relationships between the electrical and hydrogeological properties of rocks and soils. In: Hydrogeophysics (eds Y.Rubin and S.S.Hubbard ), ch. 4, pp. 87–128. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. LinH.J., RichardsD.R., TalbotC.A., YehG.T., ChengJ. and ChengH.1997. FEMWATER: A three‐dimensional finite element computer model for simulating density‐dependent flow and transport in variably saturated media . US Army Corps of Engineers and Pennsylvania State, University Technical Report, CHL‐97‐12.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. ParkS.1998. Fluid migration in the vadose zone from 3‐D inversion of resistivity monitoring data. Geophysics63, 41–51.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. PetersonJ.E.Jr.2001. Pre‐inversion processing and analysis of tomo‐graphic radar 752 data. Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics6, 1–18.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. RamirezA., DailyW., BinleyA., LaBrecqueD. and RoelantD.1996. Detection of leaks in underground storage tanks using electrical resistance methods. Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics1, 189–203.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. RothK., SchulinR., FluhlerH. and HattingerW.1990. Calibration of time domain reflectometry for water content measurements using a composite dielectric approach. Water Resources Research26(10), 2267–2273.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. RuckerD.F. and FerréT.P.A.2004. Correcting water content measurements errors associated with critically refracted first arrivals on zero offset profiling borehole ground penetrating radar profiles. Vadose Zone Journal3(1), 278–287.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. SinghaK. and GorelickS.M.2005. Saline tracer visualized with three‐dimensional electrical resistivity tomography: Field‐scale spatial moment analysis. Water Resources Research41W05023, doi:10.1029/2004WR003460.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. SlaterL., BinleyA., DailyW.and JohnsonR.2000. Cross‐hole electrical imaging of a controlled saline tracer injection. Journal of Applied Geophysics44(2–3), 85–102.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. SlaterL. and LesmesD.P.2002. Electrical‐hydraulic relationships observed for unconsolidated sediments, Water Resources Research38(10), 12131029/2001WR001075.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. SlaterL., VersteegR., BinleyA., CassianiG., BirkenR.and SandbergS.2002. A 3D ERT study of solute transport in a large experimental tank. Journal of Applied Geophysics49, 211–229.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. SlaterL., ZaidmanM.D., BinleyA.M. and WestL.J.1997. Electrical imaging of saline tracer migration for the investigation of unsaturated zone transport mechanisms. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences1, 291–302.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. ToppG.C., DavisJ.L. and AnnanA.P.1980. Electromagnetic determination of soil water content: measurements in coaxial transmission lines. Water Resources Research16, 574–582.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. VanderborghtJ., KemnaA., HardelaufH. and VereeckenH.2005. Potential of electrical resistivity tomography to infer aquifer transport characteristic from tracer studies: A synthetic case study. Water Resources Research41, 06013, doi:10.1029/2004WR003774, 23.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. van OvermeerenR.A., SariowanS.V. and GehrelsJ.C.1997. Ground penetrating radar for determining volumetric soil water content: Results of comparative measurements at two test sites. Journal of Hydrology197(1–4), 316–338.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. ZaidmanM.D., MiddletonR.T., WestL.J. and BinleyA.M.1999. Geophysical investigation of unsaturated zone transport in the Chalk in Yorkshire. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology32(2), 185–198.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2006030
Loading
An experiment of non‐invasive characterization of the vadose zone via water injection and cross‐hole time‐lapse geophysical monitoring
Near Surface Geophysics 5, 183 (2007); https://doi.org/10.3997/1873-0604.2006030
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2006030
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2006030
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error