Imaging and monitoring tree‐induced subsidence using electrical resistivity imaging

References

1. Al HagreyS.A., MeissnerR., WerbanU., RabbenW. and IsmaeilA.2004. Hydro‐ and bio‐geophysics.The Leading Edge23, 670–674.
   [Google Scholar]
2. AmatoM., BassoB., CelanoG., BitellaG., MorelliG. and RossiR.2008. In situ detection of tree root distribution and biomass by multi‐electrode resistivity imaging.Tree Physiology28, 1441–1448.
   [Google Scholar]
3. BarkerR.D. and MooreM.J.1998. The application of time‐lapse electrical tomography in groundwater studies.The Leading Edge17, 1454–1458.
   [Google Scholar]
4. BentleyL.R. and GharibiM.2004. Two‐ and three‐dimensional electrical resistivity imaging at a heterogeneous remediation site.Geophysics69, 674–680.
   [Google Scholar]
5. BiddleP.G.1998. Tree Root Damage to Buildings. Volume 1.Causes, Diagnosis and Remedy.Willowmead Publishing Ltd, Wantage, UK.
   [Google Scholar]
6. BinleyA., ShawB. and Henry‐PoulterS.1996. Flow pathways in porous media: Electrical resistance tomography and dye staining image verification.Measurement Science & Technology7, 384–390.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Building Research Establishment Digest 240. 1980. Low‐rise Buildings on Shrinkable Clay Soils: Part 1. New Edition 1993.
   [Google Scholar]
8. BurgessS.S.O. and BlebyT.M.2006. Redistribution of soil water by lateral roots mediated by stem tissues.Journal of Experimental Botany57, 3283–3291.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Cameron, D.A.2001. The extent of soil desiccation near trees in a semiarid environment.Geotechnical and Geological Engineering19, 357–370.
   [Google Scholar]
10. CoderK.1999. Drought Damage to Trees.University of Georgia School of Forest Resources Extension Publication for 99‐010.
    [Google Scholar]
11. ConeinJ. and BarkerR.2002. The effects of tree roots on the electrical properties of Triassic clay.Proceedings of 8th Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society – European Section, Aveiro, Portugal, pp. 177–180.
    [Google Scholar]
12. DannowskiG. and YaramanciU.1999. Estimation of water content and porosity using radar and geoelectrical measurements.Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics4, 71–85.
    [Google Scholar]
13. DriscollR.1983. The influence of vegetation on the swelling and shrinking of clay soils in Britain.Geotechnique33, 93–105.
    [Google Scholar]
14. GassonP.E. and CutlerD.F.1990. Tree root plate morphology.Arboricultural14, 193–264.
    [Google Scholar]
15. HultineK.R., ScottR.L., CableW.L., GoodrichD.C. and WilliamsD.G.2004. Hydraulic redistribution by a dominant, warm‐desert phreatophyte: seasonal patterns and response to precipitation pulses.Functional Ecology18, 530–538.
    [Google Scholar]
16. JonesL.2004. Cracking Open. Planet Earth Autumn (www.nerc.ac.uk).
17. KemnaA., VanderborghtJ., KulessaB. and VereeckenH.2002. Imaging and characterisation of subsurface solute transport using electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and equivalent transport models.Journal of Hydrology267, 125–146.
    [Google Scholar]
18. LawsonM.2000. Tree‐related subsidence of low rise buildings and the management options. PhD thesis, The Institute of Biology, London.
    [Google Scholar]
19. LefflerA.J., PeekM.S., RyelR.J., IvansC.Y. and CaldwellM.M.2005. Hydraulic redistribution through the root systems of senesced plants.Ecology86, 633–642.
    [Google Scholar]
20. LiuS.Y. and YehT.C.J.2004. An integrative approach for monitoring water movement in the vadose zone.Vadose Zone Journal3, 681–692.
    [Google Scholar]
21. LokeM.H.1996–2004. Tutorial: 2D and 3D Electrical Imaging Surveys. M.H.Loke.
    [Google Scholar]
22. LokeM.H.1999. Time‐lapse resistivity imaging inversion.Proceedings of the 5th Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics – European Section, Budapest, Hungary.
    [Google Scholar]
23. LokeM.H. and BarkerR.D.1996. Rapid least‐squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosections by a quasi‐Newton method.Geophysical Prospecting44, 131–152.
    [Google Scholar]
24. McCannD.M., EddlestonM., FenningP.J. and ReevesG.M.1997. Modern Geophysics in Engineering Geology.Geological Society Engineering Geology.
    [Google Scholar]
25. McCarterW.J.1984. The electrical‐resistivity characteristics of compacted clays.Geotechnique34, 263–267.
    [Google Scholar]
26. PanissodC., MichotD., BenderitterY. and TabbaghA.2001. On the effectiveness of 2D electrical inversion results: an agricultural case study.Geophysical Prospecting49, 570–576.
    [Google Scholar]
27. ReynoldsJ.M.2001. An Introduction to Applied and Environmental Geophysics.John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
28. RussellE. and BarkerR.2004. Variation of clay resistivity with moisture loss.Proceedings of 10th Annual Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics – European Section, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
    [Google Scholar]
29. SmethurstJ.A., ClarkeD. and PowrieW.2006. Seasonal changes in pore water pressure in a grass‐covered cut slope in London Clay.Geotechnique56, 523–537.
    [Google Scholar]
30. ThomasP.2000. Trees: Their Natural History. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
31. TuressonA.2006. Water content and porosity estimated from ground‐penetrating radar and resistivity.Journal of Applied Geophysics58, 99–111.
    [Google Scholar]
32. ZumeJ.T., TarhuleA. and ChristensonS.2006. Subsurface Imaging of an abandoned solid waste landfill site in Norman, Oklahoma.Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation26, 62–69.
    [Google Scholar]