1887
Volume 30, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1354-0793
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

A 3D subsurface structural model was built in a zone of the Greater Bay du Nord area, Flemish Pass Basin, offshore Newfoundland and Labrador, to carry out a post-drilled, fault-seal analysis in a multi-rift, geological complex setting; this aimed to test fault-seal predictions, calibrate computed static fault-zone attributes and estimate hydrocarbon contact depths.

Hydrocarbon exploration campaigns in the Greater Bay du Nord area have primarily targeted rotated fault blocks that often exhibit structural segmentation and compartmentalization. A comprehensive approach that combines empirical and deterministic methods for static fault-seal analysis has been implemented. This approach provides insights into open, base and tight fault-seal scenarios, aiding prospect evaluation in this region. Notably, shale gouge ratios (SGRs) in the range 16–25% serve as a crucial indicator of the transition between fault-rock sealing and non-sealing fault segments. Furthermore, it emphasizes the critical role of hydrodynamics when calibrating or evaluating fault-sealing properties.

In areas like the Greater Bay du Nord region, characterized by complex geology, it is imperative to regularly update fault-seal models. These updates should align with the availability of new subsurface data, comprehensive analyses and an improved understanding of the petroleum system.

This article is part of the Fault and top seals 2022 collection available at: https://www.lyellcollection.org/topic/collections/fault-and-top-seals-2022

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2023-019
2023-12-14
2024-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Allan, U.S.1989. Model for hydrocarbon migration and entrapment within faulted structures. AAPG Bulletin, 73, 803–811, https://doi.org/10.1306/44B4A271-170A-11D7-8645000102C1865D
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bernal, A., Tonn, R., Novoa, E. and Søderstrøm, B.2018. Structural style and fault evolution in the Greater Bay du Nord area, Flemish Pass Basin, Offshore Newfoundland. In: Silva, R.L., Brown, D.E. and Post, P.J. (eds) Celebrating 10 years of the CMC: Pushing the Boundaries of Knowledge, Conjugate Margins Conference, 19–22 August 2018, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Extended Abstracts. Conjugate Margins Conference (CMC), 36–44.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bretan, P.2017. Trap Analysis: an automated approach for deriving column height predictions in fault-bounded traps. Petroleum Geoscience, 23, 56–69, https://doi.org/10.1144/10.44petgeo2016-022
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Fisher, Q.J. and Knipe, R.J.1998. Fault sealing processes in siliciclastic sediments. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 147, 117–134, https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1998.147.01.08
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Fisher, Q.J. and Knipe, R.J.2001. The permeability of faults within siliciclastic petroleum reservoirs of the North Sea and Norwegian Continental Shelf. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 18, 1063–1081, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-8172(01)00042-3
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Fisher, Q.J. and Needham, T.2016. Faulting and Fault Sealing in the Greater Bay Du Nord Area. Proprietary Study. Equinor Canada Ltd, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Foster, D.G. and Robinson, A.G.1993. Geological history of the Flemish Pass Basin, offshore Newfoundland. AAPG Bulletin, 77, 588–609, https://doi.org/10.1306/BDFF8CA4-1718-11D7-8645000102C1865D
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Frischbutter, A.A., Fisher, Q.J., Namazova, G. and Dufour, S.2017. The value of fault analysis for field development planning. Petroleum Geoscience, 23, 120–133, https://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo2016-053
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Grant, N.T.2020. Stochastic modelling of fault gouge zones: implications for fault seal analysis. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 496, 163–197, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP496-2018-135
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Grauls, D., Pascaud, F. and Rives, T.2002. Quantitative fault seal assessment in hydrocarbon-compartmentalised structures using fluid pressure data. Norwegian Petroleum Society Special Publications, 11, 141–156, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0928-8937(02)80012-1
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Guise, P., Grattoni, C.A., Allshorn, S.L., Fisher, Q.J. and Schiffer, A.2018. Stress sensitivity of mercury-injection measurements. Petrophysics, 59, 25–34, https://dx.doi.org/10.30632/PETRO_059_1_A2
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Knai, T.A. and Lescoffit, G.2020. Efficient handling of fault properties using the Juxtaposition Table Method. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 496, 199–207, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP496-2018-192
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Meng, L., Fu, X., Ly, Y., Li, X., Cheng, Y., Li, T. and Jin, Y.2017. Risking fault reactivation induced by gas injection into depleted reservoirs based on the heterogeneity of geomechanical properties of fault zones. Petroleum Geoscience, 23, 29–38, https://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo2016-031
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Mondol, N.H., Bjørlykke, K. and Jahren, J.2008. Experimental compaction of clays: relationship between permeability and petrophysical properties in mudstones. Petroleum Geoscience, 14, 319–337, https://doi.org/10.1144/1354-079308-773
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Murray, T.A., Power, W.L., Johnson, A.J., Christie, G.J. and Richards, D.R.2020. Validation and analysis procedures for juxtaposition and membrane fault seals in oil and gas exploration. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 496, 145–161, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP496-2018-171
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Revil, A. and Cathles, L.M., III1999. Permeability of shaly sands. Water Resources Research, 35, 651–662, https://doi.org/10.1029/98WR02700
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Scott, A., Schwartz, S., van Lanen, X., Martinius, A.W. and MacEachern, J.A.2018. Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous depositional systems and sequences, Flemish Pass extensional basin, Offshore Newfoundland, Canada. In: Silva, R.L., Brown, D.E. and Post, P.J. (eds) Celebrating 10 Years of the CMC: Pushing the Boundaries of Knowledge, Conjugate Margins Conference, 19–22 August 2018, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Extended Abstracts. Conjugate Margins Conference (CMC), 164–171.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Sharp, I.R., Higgins, et al.2018. Rift to drift evolution and hyper‐extension in the North Atlantic – insights from a super‐regional approach. In: Silva, R.L., Brown, D.E. and Post, P.J. (eds) Celebrating 10 years of the CMC: Pushing the Boundaries of Knowledge, Conjugate Margins Conference, 19–22 August 2018, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Oral Presentation. Conjugate Margins Conference (CMC).
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Solum, J.G. and Huisman, B.A.H.2017. Toward the creation of models to predict static and dynamic fault-seal potential in carbonates. Petroleum Geoscience, 23, 70–91, https://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo2016-044
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Sperrevik, S., Gillespie, P.A., Fisher, Q.J., Halvorsen, T. and Knipe, R.J.2002. Empirical estimation of fault rock properties. Norwegian Petroleum Society Special Publications, 11, 109–125, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0928-8937(02)80010-8
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Williams, H., Dehler, S.A., Grant, A.C. and Oakey, G.N.1999. Tectonics of Atlantic Canada. Geoscience Canada, 26, 51–70, https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/geocan26_2art01
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Yielding, G., Bretan, P. and Freeman, B.2010. Fault seal calibration: a brief review. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 347, 243–255, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP347.14
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Yielding, G., Michie, E., Bretan, P. and Fisher, Q.2016. Workflows for fault seal prediction in siliciclastics and carbonates. Search and Discovery Article #41821, AAPG/EAGE Hydrocarbon Seals of the Middle East, 18–20 January 2016, Muscat, Oman.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2023-019
Loading
/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2023-019
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error