1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Basin Research
  4. Volume 20, Issue 4
  5. Article
Volume 20 Number 4
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2117

Abstract

ABSTRACT

For 30 large‐earthquake generating subduction zones, we quantify forearc basin size and subducting seafloor roughness to see if the size and shape of geomorphologic features determine earthquake magnitude. The subduction of geomorphologic features, such as ridges and seamounts, not only influences seismicity, but increases basal erosion and subsidence of the accretionary wedge, resulting in the formation of forearc basins. Many subduction zone ruptures have been associated with these basins, where a great portion of the ruptures' asperities collocate with the basins. First, we attempt to discern a relationship between forearc and subducting geomorphology by quantifying along‐strike variations in the bathymetry associated with 30 different rupture zones and the sections of subducting seafloor adjacent to those rupture zones. Two parameters, determined from theoretical models fit to empirical semivariograms, characterize areas of bathymetry: the sill, which estimates the degree of relief in the terrain, and the range, which is the horizontal scale associated with the sill. The ratio of sill to range provides us with a measure of seafloor roughness at a scale relevant to the mechanics of subduction. We investigate the control that forearc basins and subducting bathymetric highs may have on the occurrence of large thrust earthquakes by separately comparing our rupture zone and subducting seafloor roughness measurements to the moment magnitudes of the 30 events. The trench‐parallel dimension of bathymetrically high features on the subducting seafloor appears to correlate with moment magnitude. Also, we observe in the ratio of sill to range measurements that geomorphology on the subducting seafloor and forearc constrain the earthquake size at a margin.

© 2008 The Authors. Journal Compilation © Blackwell Publishing Ltd, European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers and International Association of Sedimentologists
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2117.2008.00368.x
2008-07-08
2024-04-26

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2117.2008.00368.x
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barrientos, S.E. & Ward, S.N. (1990) The 1960 Chile earthquake: inversion for slip distribution from surface deformation. Geophys. J. Int., 103, 589–598.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bell, T.H. (1979) Mesoscale sea floor roughness. Deep-Sea Res., 26A, 65–76.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bilek, S.L. (2007) Using earthquake source durations along the Sumatra‐Andaman subduction system to examine fault‐zone variations. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 97 (1), S62–70.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bilek, S.L. & Lay, T. (1999) Rigidity variations with depth along interplate megathrust faults in subduction zones. Nature (London), 400, 443–446.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bilek, S.L., Schwartz, S.Y. & DeShon, H.R. (2003) Control of seafloor roughness on earthquake rupture behavior. Geology (Boulder), 31, 455–458.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bishop, M.P., Shroder, J.F.Jr & Colby, J.D. (2003) Remote sensing and geomorphometry for studying relief production in high mountains. Geomorphology, 55, 345–361.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Byrne, D.E., Davis, D.M. & Sykes, L.R. (1988) Loci and maximum size of thrust earthquakes and the mechanics of the shallow region of subduction zones. Tectonics, 7, 833–857.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Carr, J.R. (1995) Numerical Analysis for the Geological Sciences, 1st edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Carr, J.R. (1997) Statistical self‐affinity, fractal dimension, and geologic interpretation. Eng. Geol., 48, 269–282.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Carr, J.R. & Benzer, W.B. (1991) On the practice of estimating fractal dimension. Math. Geol., 23, 945–958.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Cloos, M. (1992) Thrust‐type subduction‐zone earthquakes and seamount asperities; a physical model for seismic rupture. Geology (Boulder), 20, 601–604.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Cloos, M. & Shreve, R.L. (1996) Shear‐zone thickness and the seismicity of Chilean‐ and Marianas‐type subduction zones. Geology (Boulder), 24, 107–110.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Delhomme, J.P. (1978) Kriging in the hydrosciences. Adv. Water Resources, 1, 251–266.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Diggle, P.J. & Ribeiro, P.J. (2006) Model‐based Geostatistics, 1st edn, Springer Series in Statistics, Springer, New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Fuller, C.W., Willett, S.D. & Brandon, M.T. (2006) Formation of forearc basins and their influence on subduction zone earthquakes. Geology, 34 (2), 65–68.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Glenn, N.F., Streutker, D.R., Chadwick, D.J., Thackray, G.D. & Dorsch, S.J. (2006) Analysis of lidar‐derived topographic information for characterizing and differentiating landslide morphology and activity. Geomorphology, 73, 131–148.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Goff, J.A. & Jordan, T.H. (1988) Stochastic modeling of seafloor morphology: inversion of sea beam data for second-order statistics. J. Geophys. Res., 93 (B11), 13589–13608.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Goff, J.A., Orange, D.L., Mayer, L.A. & Hughes‐Clarke, J.E. (1999) Detailed investigation of continental shelf morphology using a high‐resolution swath sonar survey; the Eel Margin, Northern California; the formation of continental‐Margin Strata. Mar. Geol., 154, 255–269.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Isaaks, E.H. & Srivastava, M.R. (1989) An Introduction to Applied Geostatistics, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kanamori, H. (1977) The energy release of great earthquakes. J. Geophys. Res., 82, 2981–2987.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kanamori, H. (1986) Rupture processes of subduction zone earthquakes. Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 14, 293–322.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kanamori, H. & Kikuchi, M. (1993) The 1992 Nicaragua earthquake: a slow earthquake associated with subducted sediments. Nature, 361, 714–716.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Laursen, J., Scholl, D.W. & Von Huene, R. (2002) Neotectonic deformation of the central Chile margin; deepwater forearc basin formation in response to hot spot ridge and seamount subduction. Tectonics, 21 (5), #1038, 27pp.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Llenos, A.L. & McGuire, J.J. (2007) Influence of fore‐arc structure on the extent of great subduction zone earthquakes. J. Geophys. Res., 112, #B09301, 31pp.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. McAdoo, B.G., Capone, M.K. & Minder, J. (2004) Seafloor geomorphology of convergent margins: implications for Cascadia seismic hazard. Tectonics, 23 (6), #TC6008, 15pp.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Mogi, K. (1969) Relationship between the occurrence of great earthquakes and tectonic structures. Bull. Earthquake Res. Inst.; Tokyo Daigaku Jishin Kenkyusho Iho, 47, 429–451.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. R Development Core Team
    R Development Core Team (2007) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN: 3‐900051‐07‐0. http://www.R‐project.org
  28. Ribeiro, P.J. & Diggle, P.J. (2001) geoR: A package for geostatistical analysis. R‐News, 1(2). http://cran.r‐project.org/doc/Rnews
  29. Satake, K., Wang, K. & Atwater, B.F. (2003) Fault slip and seismic moment of the 1700 Cascadia earthquake inferred from Japanese tsunami descriptions. J. Geophys. Res., 108 (B11), #2535, 17pp.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Smith, W.H.F. & Sandwell, D.T. (1997) Global seafloor topography from satellite altimetry and ship depth soundings. Science, 277, 1956–1962.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Song, T.A. & Simons, M. (2003) Large trench‐parallel gravity variations predict seismogenic behavior in subduction zones. Science, 301, 630–633.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Spence, W., Mendoza, C., Engdahl, E.R., Choy, G.L. & Norabuena, E. (1999) Seismic subduction of the Nazca ridge as shown by the 1996–97 Peru earthquakes; Seismogenic and Tsunamigenic processes in shallow subduction zones. Pure Appl. Geophys., 154, 753–776.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Sugiyama, Y. (1994) Neotectonics of southwest Japan due to the right‐oblique subduction of the Philippine Sea plate. Geofis. Int., 33, 53–76.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Sung, Q.‐C. & Chen, Y.‐C. (2004) Self‐affinity dimensions of topography and its implications in morphotectonics; an example from Taiwan. Geomorphology, 62, 181–198.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Tanioka, Y., Ruff, L. & Satake, K. (1997) What controls the lateral variation of large earthquake occurrence along the Japan Trench?Island Arc, 6, 261–266.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Thatcher, W. (1990) Order and diversity in the modes of circum‐Pacific earthquake recurrence. J. Geophys. Res., 95, 2609–2623.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Vogel, R.M., Matalas, N.C., England, J.F. & Castellarin, A. (2007) An assessment of exceedence probabilities of envelope curves. Water Resources Res., 43, W07403.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Von Huene, R. & Scholl, D.W. (1991) Observations at convergent margins concerning sediment subduction, subduction erosion, and the growth of continental crust. Rev. Geophys., 29, 279–316.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Wells, R.E., Blakely, R.J., Sugiyama, Y., Scholl, D.W. & Dinterman, P.A. (2003) Basin‐centered asperities in great subduction zone earthquakes; a link between slip, subsidence, and subduction erosion?J. Geophys. Res., 108 (B10), #2507, 30pp.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2117.2008.00368.x
Loading
Quantifying geomorphology associated with large subduction zone earthquakes
Basin Research 20, 531 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2117.2008.00368.x
/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2117.2008.00368.x
/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2117.2008.00368.x
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error